Describes the intended objective(s) for a patient, group or organization care, for example, weight loss, restoring an activity of daily living, obtaining herd immunity via immunization, meeting a process improvement objective, etc.

Goal can be achieving a particular change or merely maintaining a current state or even slowing a decline.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

An Extension

Identifies one permanent or primary tooth using ISO 3950 FDI notation when the containing resource has no bodySite element.

Preserves an unqualified description of an implant's schematic position within its FDI tooth site. The text is not a measurement or a coded anatomical location.

Preserves an unqualified crown-fracture description without asserting tissue depth, crown-root extent, severity, or equivalence to a clinical terminology concept.

Preserves whether the source explicitly marked a tooth's orthodontic state as progressive. It does not classify the change as pathological or intended treatment movement.

Preserves whether the source marked one tooth position as a cantilever pontic role. It does not establish that a Device exists or infer a bridge identity, supporting abutment, or support relationship.

Preserves an unqualified root-resection chart description and its optional source root name as one assertion. It does not assert that a procedure was performed, requested, or scheduled.

Preserves one source-declared papilla-loss grade, its mesial or distal site, and the source's named classification attribution without publishing or claiming equivalence to a clinical scale terminology.

Preserves the tooth surface recorded for a bracket using the issuer-owned FDI buccal or lingual code. It does not establish that a Device exists when carried on chart or target state.

Preserves one unqualified target endodontic-state description with its optional source root name. Absence of a root denotes the separate whole-tooth fallback and never a distinct canal.

Preserves an unqualified target root-fracture description and its optional source root name as one assertion without inferring a diagnosis.

Preserves an unqualified target apical-finding description and its optional source root name as one assertion without inferring a diagnosis.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The state of the goal throughout its lifecycle.

This element is labeled as a modifier because the lifecycleStatus contains codes that mark the resource as not currently valid.

Codes that reflect the current state of a goal and whether the goal is still being targeted.

Allows knowing whether goal needs to be further tracked.

Describes the progression, or lack thereof, towards the goal against the target.

Indicates the progression, or lack thereof, towards the goal against the target.

Human-readable and/or coded description of a specific desired objective of care, such as "control blood pressure" or "negotiate an obstacle course" or "dance with child at wedding".

If no code is available, use CodeableConcept.text.

Codes providing the details of a particular goal. This will generally be system or implementation guide-specific. In many systems, only the text element will be used.

Without a description of what's trying to be achieved, element has no purpose.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Identifies the patient, group or organization for whom the goal is being established.

Subject is optional to support annonymized reporting.

The identified conditions and other health record elements that are intended to be addressed by the goal.

Allows specific goals to explicitly linked to the concerns they're dealing with - makes the goal more understandable.

Describes the intended objective(s) for a patient, group or organization care, for example, weight loss, restoring an activity of daily living, obtaining herd immunity via immunization, meeting a process improvement objective, etc.

Goal can be achieving a particular change or merely maintaining a current state or even slowing a decline.

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation.

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content might not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content. Often, this is a reference to an implementation guide that defines the special rules along with other profiles etc.

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element. Often, when used, the URL is a reference to an implementation guide that defines these special rules as part of it's narrative along with other profiles, value sets, etc.

The base language in which the resource is written.

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource. Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

A human language.

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource and can be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded information is added later.

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again. Contained resources may have profiles and tags In their meta elements, but SHALL NOT have security labels.

An Extension

Identifies one permanent or primary tooth using ISO 3950 FDI notation when the containing resource has no bodySite element.

Preserves an unqualified description of an implant's schematic position within its FDI tooth site. The text is not a measurement or a coded anatomical location.

Preserves an unqualified crown-fracture description without asserting tissue depth, crown-root extent, severity, or equivalence to a clinical terminology concept.

Preserves whether the source explicitly marked a tooth's orthodontic state as progressive. It does not classify the change as pathological or intended treatment movement.

Preserves whether the source marked one tooth position as a cantilever pontic role. It does not establish that a Device exists or infer a bridge identity, supporting abutment, or support relationship.

Preserves an unqualified root-resection chart description and its optional source root name as one assertion. It does not assert that a procedure was performed, requested, or scheduled.

Preserves one source-declared papilla-loss grade, its mesial or distal site, and the source's named classification attribution without publishing or claiming equivalence to a clinical scale terminology.

Preserves the tooth surface recorded for a bracket using the issuer-owned FDI buccal or lingual code. It does not establish that a Device exists when carried on chart or target state.

Preserves one unqualified target endodontic-state description with its optional source root name. Absence of a root denotes the separate whole-tooth fallback and never a distinct canal.

Preserves an unqualified target root-fracture description and its optional source root name as one assertion without inferring a diagnosis.

Preserves an unqualified target apical-finding description and its optional source root name as one assertion without inferring a diagnosis.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

Business identifiers assigned to this goal by the performer or other systems which remain constant as the resource is updated and propagates from server to server.

This is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion). It is best practice for the identifier to only appear on a single resource instance, however business practices may occasionally dictate that multiple resource instances with the same identifier can exist - possibly even with different resource types. For example, multiple Patient and a Person resource instance might share the same social insurance number.

Allows identification of the goal as it is known by various participating systems and in a way that remains consistent across servers.

The state of the goal throughout its lifecycle.

This element is labeled as a modifier because the lifecycleStatus contains codes that mark the resource as not currently valid.

Codes that reflect the current state of a goal and whether the goal is still being targeted.

Allows knowing whether goal needs to be further tracked.

Describes the progression, or lack thereof, towards the goal against the target.

Indicates the progression, or lack thereof, towards the goal against the target.

Indicates a category the goal falls within.

Codes for grouping and sorting goals.

Allows goals to be filtered and sorted.

Identifies the mutually agreed level of importance associated with reaching/sustaining the goal.

Extensions are available to track priorities as established by each participant (i.e. Priority from the patient's perspective, different practitioners' perspectives, family member's perspectives)

The ordinal extension on Coding can be used to convey a numerically comparable ranking to priority. (Keep in mind that different coding systems may use a "low value=important".

The level of importance associated with a goal.

Used for sorting and presenting goals.

Human-readable and/or coded description of a specific desired objective of care, such as "control blood pressure" or "negotiate an obstacle course" or "dance with child at wedding".

If no code is available, use CodeableConcept.text.

Codes providing the details of a particular goal. This will generally be system or implementation guide-specific. In many systems, only the text element will be used.

Without a description of what's trying to be achieved, element has no purpose.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

Allows for alternative encodings within a code system, and translations to other code systems.

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Identifies the patient, group or organization for whom the goal is being established.

Subject is optional to support annonymized reporting.

The date or event after which the goal should begin being pursued.

Codes describing events that can trigger the initiation of a goal.

Goals can be established prior to there being an intention to start pursuing them; e.g. Goals for post-surgical recovery established prior to surgery.

Indicates what should be done by when.

When multiple targets are present for a single goal instance, all targets must be met for the overall goal to be met.

Allows the progress of the goal to be monitored against an observation or due date. Target is 0..* to support Observations with multiple components, such as blood pressure goals with both a systolic and diastolic target.

Unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element and that modifies the understanding of the element in which it is contained and/or the understanding of the containing element's descendants. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. To make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer can define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Modifier extensions SHALL NOT change the meaning of any elements on Resource or DomainResource (including cannot change the meaning of modifierExtension itself).

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

Modifier extensions allow for extensions that cannot be safely ignored to be clearly distinguished from the vast majority of extensions which can be safely ignored. This promotes interoperability by eliminating the need for implementers to prohibit the presence of extensions. For further information, see the definition of modifier extensions.

The parameter whose value is being tracked, e.g. body weight, blood pressure, or hemoglobin A1c level.

Codes to identify the value being tracked, e.g. body weight, blood pressure, or hemoglobin A1c level.

The target value of the focus to be achieved to signify the fulfillment of the goal, e.g. 150 pounds, 7.0%. Either the high or low or both values of the range can be specified. When a low value is missing, it indicates that the goal is achieved at any focus value at or below the high value. Similarly, if the high value is missing, it indicates that the goal is achieved at any focus value at or above the low value.

A CodeableConcept with just a text would be used instead of a string if the field was usually coded, or if the type associated with the Goal.target.measure defines a coded value.

Codes to identify the target value of the focus to be achieved to signify the fulfillment of the goal.

Indicates either the date or the duration after start by which the goal should be met.

Identifies when the goal should be evaluated.

Identifies when the current status. I.e. When initially created, when achieved, when cancelled, etc.

To see the date for past statuses, query history.

Captures the reason for the current status.

This will typically be captured for statuses such as rejected, on-hold or cancelled, but could be present for others.

Indicates whose goal this is - patient goal, practitioner goal, etc.

This is the individual responsible for establishing the goal, not necessarily who recorded it. (For that, use the Provenance resource.).

The identified conditions and other health record elements that are intended to be addressed by the goal.

Allows specific goals to explicitly linked to the concerns they're dealing with - makes the goal more understandable.

Any comments related to the goal.

May be used for progress notes, concerns or other related information that doesn't actually describe the goal itself.

There's a need to capture information about the goal that doesn't actually describe the goal.

Identifies the change (or lack of change) at the point when the status of the goal is assessed.

Note that this should not duplicate the goal status.

The result of the goal; e.g. "25% increase in shoulder mobility", "Anxiety reduced to moderate levels". "15 kg weight loss sustained over 6 months".

Outcome tracking is a key aspect of care planning.

Details of what's changed (or not changed).

The goal outcome is independent of the outcome of the related activities. For example, if the Goal is to achieve a target body weight of 150 lb and a care plan activity is defined to diet, then the care plan’s activity outcome could be calories consumed whereas goal outcome is an observation for the actual body weight measured.

Outcome tracking is a key aspect of care planning.